Biased Media Boycott Forum
September 17, 2019, 05:45:43 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
 51 
 on: May 26, 2010, 11:24:14 PM 
Started by Bill - Last post by Bill
Here is a verdict I am  concerned about.Since we all know
the MSMs are useless,I have put together a Obama_Convicted html
that can be downloaded and saved for attachment to emails to anyone and everyone we Patriots can think of.We the People have been worrying for almost two years,Now it is time to make our
criminal handlers worry.    yes  YOU DECIDE !

http://www.4shared.com/document/WbUZi4-9/Obama_Convicted.html

 52 
 on: May 24, 2010, 07:53:19 PM 
Started by Kat - Last post by Kat

Here's the Mark Levin interview with "James" (fictitious name), oil rig explosion survivor, who called Mark Levin to tell what happened when the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded, 4-20-10. He called in as an anonymous caller. Mark made sure he did not disclose any information what would identify him.



These 3 videos are from 60 Minutes on 5-16-10. He disclosed who he is.

1:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLJHTTOSkpg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLJHTTOSkpg</a>

2:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skDR0h2EsyU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skDR0h2EsyU</a>

3:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxFtnQdKwXk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxFtnQdKwXk</a>

When you watch/listen to these 4 videos -- does it seem to anyone that he tells a different story in the 60 Minute interview than what he does in Mark's? I know he needed to remain anonymous, but the detail is different.

 unsure



 53 
 on: May 24, 2010, 08:43:22 AM 
Started by Kat - Last post by Kat
Krauthammer: This Administration is Lawless

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj7Kp5ZJL70" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj7Kp5ZJL70</a>

 rtfm


 54 
 on: May 24, 2010, 08:40:42 AM 
Started by Bill - Last post by Kat
Yes, they do work, Bill. Thanks.

I remember back when the pet food scare was going on & I was monitoring all the rejected foods & products coming into this country from other countries. I would literally stand in the grocery store & call companies to see what the source was for their foods. Three years later, I will not buy any food from China or India. I rarely ever buy any food from MX. I shop by food source (country of origin), salt, fat, price - in that order.

When I called the companies most knew their source & would tell me. Some wouldn't say. I would tell them what my decision was -- buy or not buy -- based on their source. I would tell them about the high rate of rejections from certain countries.

 55 
 on: May 24, 2010, 04:35:14 AM 
Started by Bill - Last post by Bill
Are YOU a sovereign citizen of America ? or are YOU a Puppet =(analogous to "useful idiot") of
a criminal corporate empire ?.When We the People decide which We are,by cutting of aid,comfort and MONEY to these corporate misfits,only then,can we return to governance that our Founding Fathers intended.It is entirely up to Each and Every one of us.Boycotts work folks ! but only if,you tell them why.YOU DECIDE !

 56 
 on: May 19, 2010, 04:10:39 PM 
Started by Kat - Last post by Kat
I just found this on TPM - link. They copied/posted in full from NewsMax, which has now removed the post.


Full Text Of Newsmax Column Suggesting Military Coup Against Obama

Here is the full text of John L. Perry's column on Newsmax which suggests that a military coup to "resolve the Obama problem" is becoming more possible and is not "unrealistic." Perry also writes that a coup, while not "ideal," may be preferable to "Obama's radical ideal" -- and would "restore and defend the Constitution." Newsmax has since removed the column from its website.


Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy -- ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation -- is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.



 good

 57 
 on: May 17, 2010, 02:54:38 PM 
Started by Kat - Last post by Kat
The bloody history of Communism

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6z65il0smQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6z65il0smQ</a>

 58 
 on: May 16, 2010, 11:07:41 PM 
Started by Bill - Last post by Kat
You are quite right about the criminal handlers, Bill. Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Baucus & others need to be criminally charged, handcuffed & thrown in prison for 30 yrs.

 59 
 on: May 16, 2010, 10:47:58 PM 
Started by Bill - Last post by Kat
I mentioned Bill Ayers because he is an anarchist & a communist.

I've been researching this for 2 hrs. George Donnelly is clearly an anarchist. He has this posted all over the place. He's on Twitter with tons of fellow anarchists.

Anarchy became a social movement FROM Karl Marx's First International, along with Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Marx had a hard time getting along with anyone & part of that group slit because of conflicts of direction.  This is communist.

Please check out this guy VERY carefully. I believe him to be dangerous. I think he is an instigator & agitator. He's tweeting so he's out of jail. Too bad.

 60 
 on: May 16, 2010, 09:39:56 PM 
Started by Bill - Last post by Bill
Well maybe this man is anarchist,I don't know,but I haven't seen one word from him yet that says he is for killing anyone or blowing
up anything.Maybe there is something in the links you left that says otherwise which I will read.I do however get the idea that our
criminal handlers have ignored the Constitution and the rule of law and We the People are expected to live in a totalitarian dictatorship,or anyway this is what it appears to me.I have not as of yet found out how Bill Ayers fits into this yet,but obviously there is something you know that I don't.I will research further.cheers


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!